“And now Staatspräsident Bolz says that Christianity and the Catholic faith are threatened by us. And to that charge I can answer: in the first place it is Christians and not international atheists who now stand at the head of Germany. I do not merely talk of Christianity, no, I also profess that I will never ally myself with the parties which destroy Christianity. If many wish today to take threatened Christianity under their protection, where, I would ask, was Christianity for them in these fourteen years when they went arm and arm in atheism? No, never and at no time was greater internal damage done to Christianity than in these fourteen years when a party, theoretically Christian, sat with those who denied God in one and the same government” (NO, Speech at Stüttgart, February 15, 1933).
On the Christianity of His Volk
“Germany possessed once – as the first condition for the organization of our people on a large scale – a Weltanschauliche basis in our religion -Christianity. When this basis was shattered we see how the strength of nation turned from external affairs to internal conflicts. … These were the great periods of the civil wars, of the wars of religion” (NO, Speech at Düsseldorf, January 27, 1932).
“In 1920 in this same hall I announced as the most important point in our program the demand for the unity of all Germans. That goal has now been reached. Tremendous, unbelievable events have taken place since then. … Many of the questions raised in our program have already been solved. Today the Jewish question is no longer a German problem, but a European one. … We are the first nation to make the ingenuity and industry of our people the basis of our prosperity. If the positive element of Christianity is love of one’s neighbour, that is, caring for the sick, clothing the poor, feeding the hungry and quenching the thirst of the parched, then we are true Christians! For in these respects the people’s community of National Socialist Germany has tremendous accomplishments to its credit” (NO, Speech at Munich, February 24, 1939).
“The National Government will regard it as its first and foremost duty to revive in the nation the spirit of unity and cooperation. It will preserve and defend those basic principles on which our nation has been built. It regards Christianity as the foundation of our national morality, and the family as the basis of national life” (NO, Proclamation to the German Nation at Berlin, February 1, 1933).
“In the same way, the Government of the Reich, which regards Christianity as the unshakable foundation of the morals and moral code of the nation …” (NO, Speech at Reichstag, March 23, 1933).
“Christianity also could not content itself with building up its own altar, it was compelled to proceed to destroying the heathen altars. Only out of this fanatical intolerance could an apodictic creed form itself, and this intolerance is even its absolute presupposition” (MK, page 675).
On Compromising With Atheists
“The advantages of a personal and political nature that might arise from compromising with atheistic organizations would not outweigh the consequences which would become apparent in the destruction of general moral basic values. The national government regards the two Christian confessions as the weightiest factors for the maintenance of our nationality: their rights are not to be infringed” (NO, Speech at Reichstag, March 23, 1933).
“The greatness of Christianity was not rooted in its attempted negotiations of compromise with perhaps similarly constructed philosophical opinions of the old world, but in the inexorably fanatical preaching and representation of its own doctrine” (MK, page 487).
On False Christianity
“We demand liberty for all religious denominations in the State, so far as they are not a danger to it and do not militate against the morality and the moral sense of the German race. The party as such, stands for positive Christianity but does not bind itself in the matter of creed to any particular confession. It combats the Jewish- materialist spirit within and without us, and is convinced that our nation can achieve permanent health from within only on the principle: The Common Interest Before Self-Interest” (Point 24 of the Programme of the German National Socialist Party ).
The above statement shows not only that the German National Socialist Party stood for the Christian persuasion, but it also shows that it is the political expression of true Christianity. Our Master Jesus the Anointed states, “You will love your neighbour as yourself” (Matthew 19:19 AST). Jacob (commonly known as James) states that this is the royal law in his general letter, Chapter 2, verse 8 (AST).
Thus, the German National Socialist Party stood for the common interest of the people above self-interest, as Christians are directed to do by God in His Word. Professor D. Cajus Fabricus in his 1937 book entitled Positive Christianity [only book to be translated in English – he was a Theologian and a Professor at the University of Berlin and wrote over 21 books for Christian National Socialist and no his name is not some Roman name, its actually very common in Germany, especially Bavaria] in the Third Reich , states:
“Positive Christianity is universally known as practical Christianity, which is a Christianity not exhausting itself in expressing convictions of faith but one active in loving one’s neighbour [German (White)].”
On Christian Religious Freedom
“National Socialism has always affirmed that it is determined to take the Christian Churches under the protection of the State. For their part the churches cannot for a second doubt that they need the protection of the State, and that only through the State can they be enabled to fulfil their religious mission. Indeed, the churches demand this protection from the State” (NO, Radio Broadcast, July 22, 1933).
“No one in Germany has hitherto been persecuted for his religious views, nor will any one be persecuted on that account! … The National Socialist State has neither closed any church nor prevented any service from being held, nor has it ever influenced the form of a church service. It has neither interfered with the doctrinal teaching nor with the creed of any denomination. But the National Socialist State will ruthlessly make clear to those clergy who, instead of being God’s ministers, regard it their mission to speak insultingly of our present Reich, its organization or its leaders, that no one will tolerate a destruction of this State and that a clergy that places itself beyond the pale of the law will be called to account before the law like any other German citizen. Let it be mentioned, however, that there are tens of thousands of clergy of all Christian denominations who fulfil their ecclesiastical duties just as well or probably better than the political agitators, without ever coming into conflict with the laws of the State. The State considers their protection its task. The destruction of the enemies of the State is its duty” (NO, Speech at the Reichstag, January 30, 1939).
On Jewish Tactics
“The Jew, in any event, achieved the desired goal: Catholics and Protestants were merrily at war with one another, and the deadly enemy of Aryan humanity and of all Christendom laughed up his sleeve. Just as the Jew was once able to occupy public opinion with the struggle between federalism and centralization, and thus undermine it, while he sold out the national freedom and betrayed our fatherland to international high finance, so he was again able to loose a storm between the two German denominations, while the foundations of both were eaten away and undermined by international world Jewry … let it be pondered, further, how racial decay drags down, indeed often annuls, the final Aryan values of our German nation, so that our force as a culture-bearing people is visibly more and more in retreat and we run the great danger of ending up, at least in our great cities, where southern Italy already is today. This infection of our blood, which hundreds of thousands of our people overlook as though blind, is, moreover, promoted systematically by the Jews today. Systematically these black parasites of the nations ravish our innocent young, blonde girls and thus destroy something that can never again be replaced in this world. Both, yes, both Christian denominations regard with indifference this desecration and annihilation of a noble and unique race to whom the earth was given by the grace of God. … Today, the two denominations do not fight against the despoiler of this humanity, but strive to destroy one another. Precisely he who is folkishly oriented has the most sacred duty, each within his own denomination, to see to it that God’s will is not simply talked about outwardly, but that God’s will is also fulfilled and God’s labour not ravished. Because, God’s will once gave men their form, their being, and their faculties. Who destroys His work thereby declares war on the creation of the Lord, the divine will” (MK, pgs. 825-827).
On the Jew Usage of Negroes
“A further example may show how boundlessly today’s mankind sins in this direction. From time to time it is demonstrated to the German petty bourgeois in illustrated periodicals that for the first time here or there a Negro has become a lawyer, teacher, even clergyman, or even a leading opera tenor or something of that kind. While the stupid bourgeoisie, marvelling, takes cognizance of this miraculous training, filled with respect for this fabulous result of our present educative skill, the Jew knows very slyly how to construe from this a new proof of the correctness of his theory of the equality of men which he means to instil into the nations. It does not dawn upon this depraved bourgeois world that here one has actually to do with a sin against all reason; that it is a criminal absurdity to train a born half-ape until one believes a lawyer has been made of him, while millions of members of the highest culture race have to remain in entirely unworthy positions; that it is a sin against the will of the eternal Creator to let hundreds and hundreds of thousands of His most talented beings degenerate in the proletarian swamp of today, while Hottentots and Zulu Kafirs are trained for intellectual vocations. For it is training, exactly as that of the poodle, and not a scientific ‘education.’ The same trouble and care, applied to intelligent races, would fit each individual a thousand times better for the same achievements” (MK, page 639-640).
On Communism and Bolshevism
“As M. Stalin in his last great speech expressed the fear that forces hostile to the Soviet might be active in Germany, I must correct this opinion insofar by stating here that communistic tendencies or even propaganda would be no more tolerated in Germany than German National Socialistic tendencies would be tolerated in Russia” (NO, Speech at Reichstag, January 30, 1934).
“And lastly, Germany, her rear secure, could have thrown herself heart and soul into her essential task, the ambition of my life and the raison d’être of National Socialism – the destruction of Bolshevism” (TAH, pg. 6).
On Homosexuality and Pederasty
“The National Socialist State is neither prudish nor deceitful. There are, however, certain moral principles adherence to which is in the interests of the biological health of a nation, and with which we tolerate no tampering. Pederasty and sexual offenses against children are punishable by law in this State, and no matter who commits such crimes. “When, some five years ago, certain heads of the National Socialist party were found guilty of these crimes, they were shot. When other persons in public or private life, even priests, are guilty of such offenses, they are, according to law, sentenced to terms of imprisonment or hard labor” (NO, Speech at the Reichstag, January 30, 1939).
On Masons and the Jews
“Could the Freemasons perhaps stop the war?-this most noble of philanthropic institutions who foretold the good fortune of the people louder than anyone and who at the same time was the principal leader in promoting the war. Who, after all, are the Freemasons? You have to distinguish two grades. To the lower grade in Germany belong the ordinary citizens who through the claptrap which is served up to them can feel themselves to be ‘somebodies,’ but the responsible authorities are those many-sided folk who can stand any climate, those 300 Rathenaus who all know each other, who guide the history of the world over the heads of Kings and Presidents, those who will undertake any office without scruples, who know how brutally to enslave all peoples – once more the Jews!” (NO, Speech at Munich, April 13, 1923).
(MK) – Hitler, Adolf. Mein Kampf. New York: Reynal & Hitchcock, 1941.
(NO) – Hitler, Adolf. My New Order . New York: Reynal & Hitchcock, 1941.