The Real Adolf Hitler – Adolf Hitler’s Genealogy (Chapter II)

In dealing with Adolf Hitler’s Genealogy, it us unfortunately necessary to deal with the preposterous absurdity put worth by so many Jews that Adolf Hitler himself was Jewish, part Jewish (and even African)! This LIE, like many other lies regarding Adolf Hitler, was put forth during and shortly after the war as the result of the Jewish-Anglo-American-USSR controlled propaganda machine, which sought to do anything, but actually tell the TRUTH regarding Adolf Hitler. Ironically, this lie was originally put forth to turn the Anglo-American “anti-Semites” against Adolf Hitler, convincing them that he and the National Socialist Germany were merely part of the Jewish conspiracy. Propaganda was circulated, implying that he was in league with the Jewish world bankers. But as we shall see, this lie has absolutely no basis in truth, and even Jews (some) today admit it is not true.

The most popular form of that lie that Adolf Hitler had Jewish blood originated with Hans Frank in a manuscript entitled In View of the Gallows, written in Hamburg while he was imprisoned there.

This Hans Frank stated: Adolf Hitler’s father was the illegitimate son of a woman with the last name Schicklgruber from Leonding near Linz, who worked as a cook in a Graz household…. This cook called Schicklgruber, Adolf Hitler’s grandmother, was employed in a Jewish household by the name of Frankenberger when she gave birth to her child. And this Frankenberger paid child support to Fraulein Schicklgruber on behalf of his approximately nineteen-year-old son for this period from the child’s birth until his fourteenth year of age. There also was correspondence for years between these Frankenbergers and Adolf Hitler’s grandmother, the overall tenor of which….was that Fraulein Schiklgruber’s illegitimate child had been conceived under circumstances that made the Franknebergers responsible to pay child support… Accordingly, Adolf Hitler was one-fourth Jewish”

Hans Frank was a lwayer who claimed that in 1930, Adolf Hitler asked him to investigate whether he had Jewish blood. After making inquiries, Frank cliams that he found the above information. However, no legitimate Adolf Hitler historian or revisionist today believe that this information is even remotely possible. The Jews themselves now admit:

“These investigations decisively contradicted the allegations that Adolf Hitler’s grandfather was Jewish. Since Alois Schicklgruber was born on June 7, 1837, a Jew named Frankenberger would have had to be employed in Graz that same year. Both preconditions, however, are untrue. Neither in the registry books of the Jewish synagogue nor in the birth records of other religious communities of Graz is a Frankenberger to be found. An Alois Schicklgruber appears for the first time in 1900; but since he was much younger than Alois Schicklgruber, he naturally is out of the question as Alois’ father. The case is similar with Maria Anna Schicklgruber who is recorded neither in the Graz domestic register nor in the municipal register; for the time in question, which was impossible anyway, since she was living in Walfviertel in Lower Austria as a subject of the Counts of Ottonstein (Nizcor Project web site).”

Historian Werner Maser has stated that he believes Hans Frank made-up the entire story. Other historians are more reserved and state that, while he may have investigated Adolf Hitler’s genealogy, he was a very bad researcher or outright liar. However, the facts indicate that Frank made it up entirely!

So, let us move on to the FACTS:

Genealogy of Adolf Hitler

Genealogy of Adolf Hitler

Adolf Hitler’s father, Alois Hitler, was born in 1837 as the illegitimate son of Maria Schicklgruber, who was then forty-two and unmarried, and was registered in the city of Döllersheim. Alois used the name Schicklgruber for several years as a young man. When Alois was five years old, his mother married Johann Georg Hiedler or Hitler (documents show the name spelled both ways). Alois used Schicklgruber until he was thirty-nine, when in 1876 (thirteen years before Adolf Hitler was born), a baptismal certificate was issued which stated that Johann Georg Hitler was Alois’ biological father, and he just took a while to marry his mother, and it took a while longer to get Alois legitimized in the Church record books. (Some historians believe there is some evidence that Johann Georg’s brother, Johann Nepomuk, was actually Alois’ father).

It has been suggested (not proven) that Adolf Hitler’s father, was never acknowledged by Johann Hiedler to be his son, and in the suggestion that Johann Georg Hiedler was already dead in 1876 when the baptismal record was changed. The reason proposed as to why Georg never acknowledged Alois as his son was because he was not. Rather Alois was the illegitimate son of Georg’s brother, Johann Nepomuk Hiedler or Hitler (again both spellings were used). Johann Nepomuk Hiedler was a wealthy man by the standards of those days, but one who was also married. Furthermore, it has been suggested (not proven) that because, Johann Nepomuk Hiedler was a wealthy man, he persuaded his brother Georg to marry Maria Anna, the mother of his child. In this manner he could have Alois in his household, while keeping his wife from becoming suspicious.

Further “prove” of this “hypothesis” is shown in the fact that Alois spent his youth on the estate of Johann Nepomuk Hiedler (again both spellings were used), instead of his mother. Furthermore, when Alois’ name was formally changed to Hitler (again both spellings were used) in 1876, Alois was included in his uncle’s will. This of course, does not prove anything, since it would not be unheard of for his uncle to leave a favourite nephew his estate, with the provision that the nephew carry his name; and by the time Alois actually inherited the estate, he had married Nepomuk’s granddaughter, so Nepomuk could as easily have been leaving his estate to his granddaughter and great-grandchildren.

BUT, the point is, Alois had no reason to claim Johann Georg as his biological father if he was not! He was already heir, and the inheritance from Nepomuk was not affected by such a claim either! It is also understandable why a young Alois might have been sent to live with Nepomuk (also not uncommon in German tradition!), since he was wealthy with a large estate and living there would provide much more opportunity for the young boy.

Of course, with the occupation of the allies, research in this area has deliberately been covered up and made difficult after 1945, the communists destroyed much of Döllersheim, where Alois had been born, and specifically the homes of Adolf Hitler’s family, as has been documented by Werner Maser.

Upon implementation of the 1945 German Instrument of Surrender and the Allied Occupation of Austria, Döllersheim was seized by the Soviet Army and, despite raised claims for restitution, has remained a military exclusion zone (renamed Truppenübungsplatz Allentsteig) to this day.

Regardless, since both were brothers, genetically it makes no difference! Of course, in keeping with Jewish “tradition”, in the 1950’s the Jews claimed that it had been Adolf Hitler who had destroyed Döllersheim to keep anyone finding out about supposed Jewish ancestry. But in fact, it was the Jews who even destroyed the grave of Maria Hitler, Adolf Hitler’s grandmother!

Grave of Maria Hitler before being desecrated by Jews

Grave of Maria Hitler before being desecrated by Jews

Now as far as Franks’ claims, here are some more facts. He claimed that Alois’ mother Maria was working for a Jewish household in Graz in the 1830’s. However, Jews have been expelled from Graz in the 15th century, none were to return until 1856, as has been established by Nikolaus Predarovich. So there were NO Jewish households in Graz for her to work in. But, beyond this, never lived in Graz in the first place!

She was living in Walfviertel at the time, in Döllersheim. Additionally, several historians have searched the records in Graz and have found NO evidence of either Maria or a Frankenberger, Jewish or not, living there who could have been Alois’ father.

If, Hans Frank (coincidence “Frankenberger”? He could just as well implied a “Frankenstein” — end of sarcasm) really did find a “research” about a Jew named Frankenberger, it was most likely that of his own grandfather, who he later shortened to the name of Frank. Rosenbaum states that Hans Frank did indeed believe he had a Jewish grandfather named Frankfurter and that Frank in Jewish fantasies projected this onto Adolf Hitler!

Frank also claimed that a distant relative of Adolf Hitler’s had provided this story initially and that there had been letters exchanged between this Frankenberger and Maria Hitler (Schicklgruber). However, this distant relative, who supossedly was the Irish born William Patrick Hitler, NEVER confirmed this story, even though he served as an agent of the United States during the war; and the letters have NEVER been found! Hans Frank seemed to be all too willing to do the bidding of Jews at Nuremberg. Whereas, men like Julius Streicher never gave an inch to the Jews, even to the very end when he said, “Now it goes to God… Purim Fest, 1946,” before they murdered him!, Hans Frank cowed down to the Jews. He had a “jail-house” conversion to Catholicism (sic) and said in court, “a thousand years shall not suffice to erase the guilt brought on “our people” by Adolf Hitler’s conduct”. Frank’s own son, in a book about his father, described him according to Rosenbaum, as “a craven coward and weakling, but one not without a kind of animal cunning, an instinct for lying, insinuation, self-aggrandizement”. So Frank was the perfect candidate of what we have come to know of the characteristic of the Jew and was the perfect tool for Jewish propaganda. But, the Jews killed their lackey anyway.

Anyway it is necessary to put these lies to rest and to openly discuss “rumours” as for what it is, viscous rumours and anti-German, anti-Adolf Hitler, anti-National Socialist and anti-Christian propaganda!

It should be noted that Hans Frank was the first to put forth this Frankenberger story, but he was not the first to claim that Adolf Hitler was Jewish. In 1933, the London Daily Mirror published a picture of a gravestone in a Jewish cemetery in Bucharest with the name of Adolf Hittler (two t’s) written in Hebrew letters. They implied to the readers that this Adolf Hittler was a grandfather or father to the real Adolf Hitler. But, of course it was completely de-bunked as a sham and was meant only to sow discord among National Socialist sympathizers throughout the world. Ironically, the paper has been sold by Lord Rothermere, its co-founder, in 1931, who had been a supporter of Adolf Hitler. In just two years, his paper had become a tool of the Jews and today it is nothing but a cheap tabloid.

Another commonly circulated Jewish “claim” as that Baron Rothschild of Vienna had impregnated Maria Schiklgruber. This claim, too is so absurd, that we might as well say that Adolf Hitler’s grandfather was a Martian!; however, as absurd as it is, it has served the Jews well over the years as another in a long series of lies attempting to disparage Adolf Hitler. This is a common ploy of the Jew used time and time again. Jews love to write books about the inner turmoil and self-hate that drives men like Adolf Hitler to hate the Jews. They have claimed that Richard Wagner, an unashamed anti-Jew, was the bastard son of a Jew. The same Jews write filth about Jesus Christ (just look at their vile Talmud, today’s war on Christianity), whom they call the most virulent anti-Jew/Semite Who ever lived, and the New Testament the most anti-Semitic documents ever written (the main reason they get their Satanic claws into it, to water it down to nothing!) (not to mention the removal of the most racially aware books of the Old Testament LXX watering it down and/or not coinciding with the New Testament, another blatant LIE), and then in the same breath they accuse Jesus Christ and the Apostles of being Jews (hypocrisy to divide, sow discord and chaos). Like the old saying goes: “I imagined it to be “true in my mind”, when in essence it is in the nature to suffer from mental retardation and confusion).

“Everybody who has the right kind of feeling for his country is solemnly bound, each within his own denomination, to see to it that he is not constantly talking about the Will of God merely from the lips but that in actual fact he fulfils the Will of God and does not allow God’s handiwork to be debased. For it was by the Will of God that men were made of a certain bodily shape, were given their natures and their faculties. Whoever destroys His work wages war against God’s Creation and God’s Will. The greatness of Christianity did not arise from attempts to make compromises with those philosophical opinions of the ancient world which had some resemblance to its own doctrine, but in the unrelenting and zealous proclamation and defence of its own teaching.” (MK)

“I do not merely talk of Christianity, no, I also profess that I will never ally myself with the parties which destroy Christianity.” (NO, Stuttgart, February 15, 1933)

I leave you with this verse Galatians (5:19-21 – AST):-

“Now the actions of the flesh are clearly revealed, which are: Mongrelization (race-mixing), whoredom, impurity, raping, idol-service, pharmakeia, enmities, strife, jealousies, angers, rivalries, divisions, heresies, envyings, [!]murders[!], drunkenness, revellings, and things like these, which I tell before, as also I said previously, that those practising these things will not inherit the government of God” (AST).

This verse enforces, Adolf Hitler’s above quotes, do not ally yourself with the enemy of Christianity!

“I do not merely talk of Christianity, no, I also profess that I will never ally myself with the parties which destroy Christianity.” (NO, Stuttgart, February 15, 1933)

Chapter III to follow….

The Real Adolf Hitler – The Early Years (Chapter I), this is how the journey began…..

Just as the Jew once incited the mob of Jerusalem against Christ, so today he must incite succeed inciting folk who have been duped into madness to attack thos who, God’s Truth! seek to deal with people in utter honesty and sincerity. And so he begins to intimidate them, and he knows that his pressure in itself is enough to shut the mouths of hundreds, yes thousands. For they think, if I only hold my tongue, then I shall be safe in case they come into power. No, my friend. The only difference will be that I may hang perhaps still talking, while you will hang — in silence.

– Adolf Hitler, Munich, July 28, 1922

People ask: is there someone fit to be our leader? Our task is not to search for that person. Either God will give him to us or he will not come. Our task is to shape the sword that he will need when he comes. Our task it to provide the leader with a nation which is ready for him when he comes! My fellow Germans, awaken! The new day is dawning!

– Adolf Hitler, Munich, May 04, 1923

The Real Adolf Hitler – The Early Years, this is how the journey began…..

On April 20, 1889, at 6:30 in the evening, Adolf Hitler was born in Braunau, a small Austrian village. It was a Saturday, the day before Easter, and baby Adolf was the fourth child of Alois Hitler, Sr. (7 June 1837 – 3 January 1903) and Klara Hitler (née Pölzl; 12 August 1860 – 21 December 1907). The first three children, Gustav, Ida and Otto, had all already died. Otto had died just a few days after his birth in September 1887 and January 1888, Gustav and Ida both died after contracting diptheria. Alois and Klara had lost three children in less than five months. They surely had better hope and faith for young Adolf, now effectively the oldest son, but they realistically knew that times were hard in the small Austrian hamlet. Malnourishment and disease had not een kind to them or their neighbours.

Klara herself was one of only three to survive in her family, out of eleven children. Klara was the oldest to survive, along with her sisters Johanna and Theresia, She and Alois were second cousins, both descended from Martin Hiedler, Alois’s grandfather and her great-grandfather. In this disease ravished small community, marriage between second cousins and even first cousins was not unusual at all, and certainly not any more unusual than it was among the early pioneers of America (or anywhere else for that matter). Klara was Alois’ third wife. His first wife, Anna Glassl, had been too old to bear children when they married, and they later divorced. His second marriage to Franziska (Fanni) Matzelberger, had produced Alois Jr. and a daughter Angela, but soon thereafter, Fanni contracted tuberculosis and died. Klara stepped in to help with the children, and she and Alois were later married. Alois was a customs official in Braunau, and in April 1889, with the responsibility of raising young Alois jr. and Angela, and having lost a wife and three children to disease in just a few short years, he must have wondered too about young Adolf’s chances.

However, Adolf would be the first child to make it past the age of three. They would go on to have Edmund in 1894 and finally Paula, in 1896. Adolf had been born on the border (Braunau was actually part of Bavaria (google it) of Austria and Germany, and he later said in Mein Kampf that he saw it is as his duty to unite the two countries.

In 1892, the family moved to the other side of the border, into Passau, Bavaria, where his father received a job promotion. After the job promotion, they were able to hire a maid, Rosalia Schichtl, and Klara’s siter Johanna also lived with the family. Alois had received an inheritance from his uncle (and Klara’s grandfather), Johann Nepomuk Heuttler after his death in 1888. This, coupled with the income from his job promotion, made life a bit easier financially in the 1890’s. Little more is known about Adolf’s family at this time. Paula Hitler would later describe her father as a strong disciplinarian, and headstrong and little Adolf was reported to be on the receiving end of much of this discipline. Adolf says of his parents,

“…. my parents: the father a faithful civil servant, the mother devoting herself to the cares of the household and looking after her children with eternally the same loving kindness…” (MK)

Adolf Hitler as Baby

Adolf Hitler as Baby

Klara Hitler (née Pölzl; 12 August 1860 – 21 December 1907)

Klara Hitler (née Pölzl; 12 August 1860 – 21 December 1907)

Alois Hitler, Sr. (born Alois Schicklgruber; 7 June 1837 – 3 January 1903)

Alois Hitler, Sr. (born Alois Schicklgruber; 7 June 1837 – 3 January 1903)

Alois retired in 1895, and hook up farming on a tract of land for the family bought in Fischlham, where Adolf, whom his parents called Adi, began his schooling. In 1898, the family moved to some property near Lambach (distance between the aforementioned villages approx 6 km). Adolf Hitler has fond memories of these years in Lambach, when he was about ten, and says in Mein Kampf; 

“…Inasmuch as I received singing lessons in my spare time in the choir of Lambach Convent, I repeatedly had an excellent opportunity of intoxicating myself with the solemn splendour of the magnificent church festivals. It was perfectly natural that the position of the abbot appeared to me to be the highest ideal obtainable, just as that of being the village pastor had appealed to my father!”

Lambach Abbey - Hakenkreuz - Abbot - Mein Kampf - Adolf Hitler

Lambach Abbey – Hakenkreuz (Hooked Cross) – Abbot – Mein Kampf – Adolf Hitler

At the Abbey in Lambach, Adolf Hitler no doubt learned many lessons, and his respect for the Church was such that, as he said, he for a time desired to be an abbot. It was also here that young Adolf learned to associate the Hakenkreuz (Hooked Cross) with the Church and Christianity, because there were numerous Hakenkreuz’s engraved on the four corners of the Abbey. Every time young Adolf walked into the monastery, he walked under the Hakenkreuz. The Hakenkreuz had also been carved on many of the religious objects inside the monastery (side note: many Catholic Churches in Europe will have the same, nothing, but nothing “pagan” about it, but representing the North Star – In Christian tradition, the North Star of Bethlehem, also called the Christmas Star, reveals the birth of Jesus Christ, Guiding Star!)

In November 1898, the family made one last move to Linz, in a small village called Leonding. In 1900, tragedy struck again, when Adolf’s dear little brother Edmund died just four days before his sixth birthday, having fallen victim to measles. He was buried in a cemetery next to the house. Adolf was now the only male child in the house. His school changed too, and now he had to walk an hour to school, each way, to Linz. Prior to starting school in Linz his grades in school had been outstanding and he had shown an aptitude as an artist. But after the death of his younger brother, and with the boredom and disinterested in the new curriculum at the school his father had chosen for him, his grades slid a little. His performance would improve in the following years until he left school in 1905, but the years had been hard for young Adolf, now a young man. History had been his favourite class, and he spoke fondly of his teacher in Mein Kampf, but the young Adolf Hitler aspired to be an artist above all else now (although his father wanted him to be a civil servant like himself).

Tragedy struck the family again and Alois Hitler died in 1903 of a pulmonary embolism, leaving Klara a government pension and young Adolf the only male in the household. In May, 1904, at the Linz Cathedral, Adolf Hitler received the Catholic Sacrament of Confirmation. Adolf Hitler remained a member of the Catholic Church until his death, continuing to pay his church taxes.

Shortly after his Confirmation, Adolf developed a pulmonary condition, on the advice of the family doctor, Adolf was pulled out of the boarding school at Steyr, to where he had transferred, at the age of sixteen to recuperate. But, young Adolf planned instead to go to Vienna and study art. Klara, Aunt Johanna, Adolf and Paula moved to a flat in Linz. At the age of eighteen, in 1907, with some money from Klara and his Aunt Johanna, Adolf set off to formally study art in Vienna at the Academy of Fine Arts.

However, a few months before, Klara had been diagnosed with breast cancer. She was operated on in January 1907, and Adolf paid her medical bills with the money that had been saved for his schooling in Vienna. Through several months of agony, Adolf watched his mother, the most dearest to him in life, slowly dying from the insidious disease. Still, he made a trip in September, no doubt at his mother’s insistence, to take the entrance exam at the Academy in Vienna. The first stage consisted of 133 candidates submitting work from their portfolio. Adolf Hitler passed this stage and was invited back to sit for further examination in October. Thirty-three candidates had been eliminated. By October, Dr. Eduard Bloch (Jewish), Klara’s physician, had informed Adolf of what he must have had already known, that his mother was now quickly dying. When Adolf Hitler returned in October to Vienna, he was required to produce pieces on whatever subject he was asked. From the hundred candidates, only twenty-eight were selected, and Adolf Hitler was not one of them. But this is really of little wonder given the intense personal grief he was inflicted with in the light of the seriousness of his mother’s condition. The Rector of the Academy thought Adolf Hitler’s work was more architectural, and recommended this line of work to Adolf Hitler (see below the artwork of Adolf Hitler to see the reason why I beg to differ).

Adolf Hitler returned to his mother’s bedside with his sister Paula. By this time, Adolf Hitler and Paula moved their mother to a first floor apartment, since she was too weak to go up the stairs to their former flat. She had been undergoing intense pain in the last months, receiving iodoform treatments on ulcerated skin, where the cancer was causing her tissues and skin to literally rot away! In the early hours of December 21st, at the age of forty-seven, amid the glowing lights of the family’s Christmas tree, she died quietly. Dr. Bloch later commented, “I have never seen anyone so prostrate with grief as Adolf Hitler.” She was buried next to Alois and Edmund. Adolf Hitler wrote:

“It was the end of a long and painful illness that had seemed fatal from the very beginning. Nevertheless it was a terrible shock to me. I had respected my father, but I dearly loved my mother”

Contrary to grave and erroneous propaganda, Adolf Hitler did not blame the Jewish doctor for his mother’s death. He had objectively commented that he provided excellent care and was very attentive, but there was little that he (or any other doctor) could have done for breast cancer at that time.

Now, with scarce funds left after paying his mother’s medical bills, Adolf Hitler would return for a third time to Vienna, this time to stay for several years. It was the beginning of new chapter in his life. Years later, in 1930, Adolf Hitler wrote a poem in remembrance to his mother, entitled “Your Mother”:

Your Mother!

When your mother has grown old and you are older too.

When what was easy for her now is hard to do,

When her loving, faithful eyes no longer sees the best

And her feet have trouble climbing steps,

Then lend her your arm wit sacred joy for the hour

Is coming when you must lead her crying out the door

On her last walk here on earth before dying.

And. if she asks a question, give her a soft reply,

And if she did not hear the first time, once again

Patiently answer respectfully and tenderly;

And, if she still does not understand you, happily explain –

The hour is coming, the bitter hour, when she asks you

nothing more…..”

—- Adolf Hitler, 1930!

Deine Mutter! - Adolf Hitler, 1930

Deine Mutter! – Adolf Hitler, 1930

A Collage of Watercolour Paintings by Adolf Hitler

A Collage of Watercolour Paintings by Adolf Hitler

The Real Adolf Hitler – Introduction

Quote

Adolf Hitler states that Christianity is the basis of the entire morality of National Socialist Germany!

[vimeography id=”40″]

Hitler: On His Childhood

“I had excellent opportunity to intoxicate myself with the solemn splendour of the brilliant church festivals. As was only natural, the abbot seemed to me, as the village priest had once seemed to my father, the highest and most desirable ideal” (Mein Kampf, Chap. 1).

Hitler: On the Christian Social Party

“Not until my fourteenth or fifteenth year did I begin to come across the word ‘Jew,’ with any frequency, partly in connection with political discussions…. For the Jew was still characterized for me by nothing but his religion, and therefore, on grounds of human tolerance, I maintained my rejection of religious attacks in this case as in others. Consequently, the tone particularly that of the Viennese anti- Semitic press seemed to me unworthy of the cultural tradition of a great nation. … I was not in agreement with the sharp anti-Semitic tone, but from time to time I read arguments which gave me some food for thought. At all events, these occasions slowly made me acquainted with the man and the movement, which in those days guided Vienna’s destinies: Dr. Karl Lueger (Karl Lueger (1844-1910), mayor of Vienna and leader of the Christian Social Party) and the Christian Social Party. The man and the movement seemed ‘reactionary’ in my eyes. My common sense of justice, however, forced me to change this judgement in proportion as I had occasion to become acquainted with the man and his work; and slowly my fair judgement turned to unconcealed admiration. Today, more than ever, I regard this man as the greatest German mayor of all times. … How many of my basic principles were upset by this change in my attitude toward the Christian Social movement! My views with regard to anti-Semitism thus succumbed to the passage of time, and this was my greatest transformation of all. … Hence today I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord” (Mein Kampf, Chap. 2).
“The unprecedented rise of the Christian Social Party… was to assume the deepest significance …” (Mein Kampf, Chap. 3).
“In nearly all the matters in which the Pan-German movement was wanting, the attitude of the Christian Social Party was correct and well-planned” (Mein Kampf, Chap. 3).
“The anti-Semitism of the new movement [Christian Social movement] was based on religious ideas instead of racial knowledge” (Mein Kampf, Chap. 3).
“If Dr. Karl Lueger had lived in Germany, he would have been ranked among the great minds of our people” (Mein Kampf, Chap. 3).

Hitler: Referring to Scripture (numerous)

“Verily a man cannot serve two masters. And I consider the foundation or destruction of a religion far greater than the foundation or destruction of a state, let alone a party” (Mein Kampf, Chap. 3). Note here that Adolf Hitler was quoting Matthew 6:24, which states in the Anointed Standard Translation: “No one is able to serve two masters. For either he will hate the one and he will love the other, or he will cleave to one, and he will despise the other.”

“Hastily and indifferently, people tried to pass by the unpleasant truths, as though by such an attitude events could be undone. No, the fact that our big city population is growing more and more prostituted in its love life cannot just be denied out of existence; it simply is so. …it is said with such terrible justice that the sins of the fathers are avenged down to the tenth generation. But this applies only to profanation of the blood and the race” (Mein Kampf, Chap. 10). Again, here Chancellor Hitler was referring to Deuteronomy 23:2-3 LXX “A mongrel shall not enter into the Body Politic of the Master; even to the tenth generation shall none of his enter into the Body Politic of the Master. An Ammonite or a Moabite shall not enter into the Body Politic of the Master; even to the tenth generation shall none of them enter into the Body Politic of the Master, forever. “The German Bible here used the word ‘Mischling’ for mongrel, or the paleo-Hebrew word mamzir.

“The fight against Jewish world Bolshevization requires a clear attitude toward Soviet Russia. You cannot drive out the Devil with Beelzebub” (Mein Kampf, Vol. 2, Chap. 2). As in many of his speeches, Hitler here shows his vast Biblical knowledge by referring to Luke: “But some of them said, ‘By Beelzebub, the chief of the demons, He cast out demons.’ And others, tempting, were seeking a sign from Heaven from Him. But knowing the thoughts, said to them, ‘Every government divided against itself is brought to ruin, and a house against a house falls. And if Satan is divided against himself, how will his government stand, because you say I cast out demons by Beelzebub? But if I cast out the demons by Beelzebub, your sons, by what do they cast out” (Luke 11:15-19 AST).

“But if out of smugness, or even cowardice, this battle is not fought to its end, and then takes a look at the peoples five hundred years from now. I think you will find but few images of God, unless you want to profane the Almighty” (Mein Kampf, Chap. 10). Adolf Hitler here is referring to the fact that the Bible says that Adamic, White, Aryan men were created in the image of God. He states that the process of race-mixing will destroy the purity of Adamic, Aryan men, and the mongrels that will be left are definitely not in the image of God. This statement should be read in light of the following quotation:
“Certainly we don’t have to discuss these matters with the Jews, the most modern inventors of this cultural perfume. Their whole existence is an embodied protest against the aesthetics of the Lord’s image” (Mein Kampf, Chap. 6). In other words, Jews, since they are mongrels, are not in the image of God and are an affront to the image of God.

Hitler: On Racial Purity

“What we must fight for is to safeguard the existence and reproduction of our race and our people, the sustenance of our children and the purity of our blood, the freedom and independence of the fatherland, so that our people may mature for the fulfilment of the mission allotted it by the Creator of the universe” (Mein Kampf, Chap. 8).
“Blood sin and desecration of the race are the original sin in this world and the end of a humanity which surrenders to it” (Mein Kampf, Chap. 10).

Adolf Hitler here refers to the fact that through Cain mongrelization entered into the world, as is taught in the book of Genesis.

“The result of all racial crossing is therefore in brief always the following: (a) Lowering of the level of the higher race; (b) Physical and intellectual regression and hence the beginning of a slowly but surely progressing sickness. To bring about such a development is, then, nothing else but to sin against the will of the Eternal Creator. And as a sin this act is rewarded” (Mein Kampf, Chap. 11).

“That this is possible may not be denied in a world where hundreds and hundreds of thousands of people voluntarily submit to celibacy, obligated and bound by nothing except the injunction of the Church. Should the same renunciation not be possible if this injunction is replaced by the admonition finally to put an end to the constant and continuous original sin of racial poisoning, and to give the Almighty Creator beings such as He Himself created?” (Mein Kampf, Vol. 2, Chap. 2). Adolf Hitler here shows his knowledge of mongrels as “uncreated beings” for the sin of racial poisoning leads to the existence of beings which the Almighty Creator did not create.

In a speech at Nuremberg on September 6, 1938, Adolf Hitler said: “But since we set as the central point of this perception and of this profession of belief the maintenance and hence the security for the future of a being formed by God, we thus serve the maintenance of a divine work and fulfil a divine will – not in the secret twilight of a new house of worship, but openly before the face of the Lord.” Adolf Hitler here mentions the “being formed by God,” meaning White, Adamic man who was formed in the image of God.

“A folkish state must therefore begin by raising marriage from the level of a continuous defilement of the race, and give it the consecration of an institution which is called upon to produce images of the Lord and not monstrosities halfway between man and ape” (Mein Kampf, Vol. 2, Chap. 2). Again, Adolf Hitler states that mongrels, the products of race-mixing, are not in the image of the Lord. He also shows his knowledge of the Biblical tenet that only European Adamics are men and all other created beings are animals.

“Peoples which bastardize themselves, or let themselves be bastardized, sin against the will of eternal Providence” (Mein Kampf, Chap. 11).

Hitler: On Antichrist, Mongrel Jews

“The Jew has always been a people with definite racial characteristics and never a religion” (Mein Kampf, Chap. 11).
“Due to his own original special nature, the Jew cannot possess a religious institution, if for no other reason because he lacks idealism in any form, and hence belief in a hereafter is absolutely foreign to him. And a religion in the Aryan sense cannot be imagined which lacks the conviction of survival after death in some form. Indeed, the Talmud is not a book to prepare a man for the hereafter, but only for a practical and profitable life in this world” (Mein Kampf, Chap. 11).

“The best characterization is provided by the product of this religious education, the Jew himself. His life is only of this world, and his spirit is inwardly as alien to true Christianity as his nature two thousand years previous was to the great founder of the new doctrine. Of course, the latter made no secret of his attitude toward the Jewish people, and when necessary he even took the whip to drive from the temple of the Lord this adversary of all humanity, who then as always saw in religion nothing but an instrument for his business existence. In return, Christ was nailed to the cross, while our present-day party Christians debase themselves to begging for Jewish votes at elections and later try to arrange political swindles with atheistic Jewish parties– and this against their own nation” (Mein Kampf, Chap. 11).

“First, therefore, he goes about making up to the people for his previous sins against them. He begins his career as the ‘benefactor’ of mankind. Since his new benevolence has a practical foundation, that the left hand should not know what the right hand giveth; no, whether he likes it or not, he must reconcile himself to letting as many people as possible know how deeply he feels the sufferings of the masses and all the sacrifices that he himself is making to combat them” (Mein Kampf, Chap. 11).

“But even more: all at once the Jew also becomes liberal and begins to rave about the necessary progress of mankind” (Mein Kampf, Chap. 11).

“The personification of the devil as the symbol of all evil assumes the living shape of the Jew” (Mein Kampf, Chap. 11).

“And so he [the Jew] advances on his fatal road until another force comes forth to oppose him, and in a mighty struggle hurls the heaven-stormer back to Lucifer. Germany is today the next great war aim of Bolshevism. It requires all the force of a young missionary idea to raise our people up again, to free them from the snares of this international serpent…” (Mein Kampf, Vol. 2, Chap. 14). Adolf Hitler here agrees with Jesus Christ (the Anointed) in John 8 that the Jews are indeed of their Father the Devil and that they belong in the Lake of Fire with the Devil and all his messengers.

“With satanic joy in his face, the black-haired Jewish youth lurks in wait for the unsuspecting girl whom he defiles with his blood, thus stealing her from her people” (Mein Kampf, Chap. 11). Here Hitler states that the most powerful tool that the mongrel Jew uses against the White race is that of mongrelization or race-mixing.

Hitler: On Negroes

“It would be more in keeping with the intention of the noblest man in this world if our two Christian churches, instead of annoying Negroes with missions which they neither desire nor understand, would kindly, but in all seriousness, teach our European humanity that where parents are not healthy it is a deed pleasing to God to take pity on a poor little healthy orphan child and give him father and mother, than themselves to give birth to a sick child who will only bring unhappiness and suffering on himself and the rest of the world” (Mein Kampf, Vol. 2, Chap. 2). Adolf Hitler here shows his knowledge of the fact that Negroes do not contain the capacity to be indwelled by the Mentality of Separation, but only white Adamics were chosen by God for this purpose.

Hitler: On Morality

“Parallel to the training of the body a struggle against the poisoning of the soul must begin. Our whole public life today is like a hothouse for sexual ideas and stimulations. Just look at the bill of fare served up in our movies, vaudeville and theatres, and you will hardly be able to deny that this is not the right kind of food, particularly for the youth… Theatre, art, literature, cinema, press, posters, and window displays must be cleansed of all manifestations of our rotting world and placed in the service of a moral, political, and cultural idea” (Mein Kampf, Chap. 10).

Hitler: On Atheism

In a speech at the Sportpalast on October 24, 1933, Hitler said: “Without pledging ourselves to any particular Confession, we have restored to faith its pre-requisites because we were convinced that the people need and requires this faith. We have therefore undertaken the fight against the atheistic movement, and that not merely with a few theoretical declarations: we have stamped it out.” This statement and the following quotes about paganism, “Odinism” (a homosexual promotion of the Jewish Kaballah), and other old “Nordic” mythology (http://truthforgermans.com/?cat=71) show unequivocally that Adolf Hitler (and leaders of the NSDAP) promoted only Christianity.

Hitler: On Paganism and Heathen Religion

“On the contrary, it is entirely out of harmony with the spirit of the nation to keep harping on that far-off and forgotten nomenclature which belongs to the ancient Germanic times and does not awaken any distinct association in our age. This habit of borrowing words from the dead past tends to mislead the people into thinking that the external trappings of its vocabulary are the important feature of a movement. It is really a mischievous habit; but it is quite prevalent nowadays.

At that time, and subsequently, I had to warn followers repeatedly against these wandering scholars who were peddling Germanic folk-lore and who never accomplished anything positive or practical, except to cultivate their own superabundant self-conceit. The new movement must guard itself against an influx of people whose only recommendation is their own statement that they have been fighting for these very same ideals during the last thirty or forty years.
Now if somebody has fought for forty years to carry into effect what he calls an idea, and if these alleged efforts not only show no positive results but have not even been able to hinder the success of the opposing party, then the story of those forty years of futile effort furnishes sufficient proof for the incompetence of such a protagonist. People of that kind are specially dangerous because they do not want to participate in the movement as ordinary members. They talk rather of the leading positions which would be the only fitting posts for them, in view of their past work and also so that they might be enabled to carry on that work further. But woe to a young movement if the conduct of it should fall into the hands of such people.

It is typical of such persons that they rant about ancient Teutonic heroes of the dim and distant ages, stone axes, battle spears and shields, whereas in reality they themselves are the woe-fullest poltroons imaginable. For those very same people who brandish Teutonic tin swords that have been fashioned carefully according to ancient models and wear padded bear-skins, with the horns of oxen mounted over their bearded faces, proclaim that all contemporary conflicts must be decided by the weapons of the mind alone. And thus they skedaddle when the first communist cudgel appears. Posterity will have little occasion to write a new epic on these heroic gladiators.

I have seen too much of that kind of people not to feel a profound contempt for their miserable play-acting. To the masses of the nation they are just an object of ridicule; but the Jew finds it to his own interest to treat these folk-lore comedians with respect and to prefer them to real men who are fighting to establish a German State. And yet these comedians are extremely proud of themselves.

Notwithstanding their complete fecklessness, which is an established fact, they pretend to know everything better than other people; so much so that they make themselves a veritable nuisance to all sincere and honest patriots, to whom not only the heroism of the past is worthy of honour but who also feel bound to leave examples of their own work for the inspiration of the coming generation.
Among those people there were some whose conduct can be explained by their innate stupidity and incompetence; but there are others who have a definite ulterior purpose in view. Often, it is difficult to distinguish between the two classes. The impression which I often get, especially of those so-called religious reformers whose creed is grounded on ancient Germanic customs, is that they are the missionaries and protégés of those forces which do not wish to see a national revival taking place in Germany. All their activities tend to turn the attention of the people away from the necessity of fighting together in a common cause against the common enemy, namely the Jew. Moreover, that kind of preaching induces the people to use up their energies, not in fighting for the common cause, but in absurd and ruinous religious controversies within their own ranks.” (Mein Kampf, Chap. 12).

Hitler: On Christianity

In a speech at Stuttgart on February 15, 1933, Adolf Hitler said that the desire of the National Socialist Government was to “fill our whole culture once more with a Christian spirit, and that not only in politics. We want to burn out the harmful features in our theatre and our literature.”

In a speech at Hamburg on August 17, 1934, Adolf Hitler said, “The National Socialist State professes its allegiance to positive Christianity” (bekennt sich zum positiven Christentum).

In a speech at Koblenz on August 26, 1934, Adolf Hitler said, “National Socialism neither opposes the Church nor is it anti-religious, but on the contrary it stands on the ground of a real Christianity. And we have no other desire than to be true to that position. I know that there are thousands and tens of thousands of priests who are not merely reconciled to the State of today but whom gladly give to the State their cooperation, and I am convinced that this cooperation will grow ever closer and more intimate. For their interests cannot fail to coincide with ours alike in our fight against the symptoms of degeneracy in the world of today, in our fight against Bolshevist culture, against an atheistic movement, against criminality, and in our struggle for a consciousness of a community in our national life, for the conquest of civil war and unrest, of strife and discord. These are not anti-Christian, these are Christian principles! And I believe that if we should fail to follow these principles, then we should not be able to point to our successes, for the result of our political battle is surely not unblessed by God.”

Hitler: Prayers

Hitler delivered this prayer at the close of his speech at the Reichstag on February 20th, 1938: “In this hour I would ask of the Lord God only this: that, as in the past, so in the years to come He would give His blessing to our work and our action, to our judgement and our resolution, that He will safeguard us from all false pride and from all cowardly servility, that He may grant us to find the straight path which His Providence has ordained for the German people, and that He may ever give us the courage to do the right, never to falter, never to yield before any violence, before any danger.”

“…we must pray to the Almighty not to refuse His blessing to this change and not to abandon our people in the times to come.” Hitler was here recalling a speech made by a priest after World War I (Mein Kampf, Chap. 7).
“Even today I am not ashamed to say that, overpowered by stormy enthusiasm; I fell down on my knees and thanked Heaven from an overflowing heart for granting me the good fortune of being permitted to live at this time.” (Mein Kampf, Chap. 5).

Hitler: On the German Christians

On July 19, 1933, five days after the Constitution for the United German Evangelical Church became law, Adolf Hitler wrote Reichbishop Müller, “In spite of all hostility, history will one day bear witness that you and the German Christians have willed, helped forward, and finally affected one of the most decisive acts in the moulding of the religious life of our people.”

In a radio address on July 22, 1933, regarding reform of the churches, Hitler said, “But this will never be secured by petrified religious forces which have turned their backs upon the world and who counts as of no significance the phenomena and events of their day: it can be secured only through the forces of a living Movement. These forces I see primarily marshalled in that part of the Evangelical communion (Kirchenvolk) which in the German Christian Movement has consciously taken its stand on the ground of the National Socialist State – not in an enforced submission but in a living affirmation!”

Hitler: On Conviction

“A man does not die for something which he himself does not believe in” (Mein Kampf, Chap. 3).

“I had so often sung ‘Deutschland über Alles’ and shouted ‘Heil’ at the top of my lungs, that it seemed to me almost a belated act of grace to be allowed to stand as a witness in the divine court of the Eternal Judge and proclaim the sincerity of this conviction” (Mein Kampf, Chap. 5).

“Only in the steady and constant application of force lies the very first prerequisite for success. This persistence, however, can always and only arise from a definite spiritual conviction. Any violence which does not spring from a firm, spiritual base, will be wavering and uncertain” (Mein Kampf, Chap. 5).

In a speech at Regensburg on June 6th, 1937, Adolf Hitler said: “So we go forward with the profoundest faith in God into the future. Would that which we have achieved have been possible if Providence had not helped us? I know that all the work of men is difficult and transitory when it is not blessed by this Omnipotence. But if this Omnipotence blesses a work, as it has blessed this work of ours, then men cannot destroy it. … Today more than ever are we of this faith, for this new Germany stands, and clearly marked before it lies its path into the future.”

Adolf Hitler: Miscellaneous

“Heaven will smile on us again” (Mein Kampf, Chap. 3).

“For the political leader the religious doctrines and institutions of his people must always remain inviolable; or else he has no right to be in politics, but should become a reformer, if he has what it takes!” (Mein Kampf, Chap. 3).

“The attack against dogmas as such, therefore, strongly resembles the struggle against the general legal foundations of a state, and, as the latter would end in a total anarchy of the state, the former would end in a worthless religious nihilism” (Mein Kampf, Chap. 10).

On June 27, 1937, in a speech at Würzburg, Hitler said, “…I am convinced that men who are created by God should live in accordance with the will of the Almighty. However weak the individual may be in the last resort in his whole being and action when compared with the omnipotence and will of Providence, yet at the moment when he acts as this Providence would have him act he becomes immeasurably strong.”

“It may be that today gold has become the exclusive ruler of life, but the time will come when man will again bow down before a Higher God” (Mein Kampf, Vol. 2, Chap. 2).

Hermann Göring

Hermann Göring, like Hitler, was also deeply religious. He shows his Christianity by this and similar quotes: “God gave the Saviour to the German people. We have faith, deep and unshakable faith that he [Hitler] was sent to us by God to save Germany.”

Julius Streicher

Julius Streicher was the ninth child of a Roman Catholic primary school teacher, and he also became a school teacher in Nuremberg. When Adolf Hitler was released from prison in December 1924, Streicher hailed Hitler’s return to politics as a “gift of God.” Streicher published a newspaper entitled Der Stürmer, in which he discussed Jewish ritual murder, Jewish aims to destroy Christianity, and the fact that Jesus was not a Jew. Chancellor Adolf Hitler said the following of Streicher: “The main fighter for the DSP  [Deutsch-Sozialistische Partei or German Socialist Party], as I have said, was Julius Streicher, then a teacher in Nuremberg. At first he, too, had a holy conviction of the mission and the future of his movement” (Mein Kampf, Vol. 2, Chap. 7).

Streicher wrote in an article in Der Stürmer: “If the danger of the reproduction of that curse of God in the Jewish blood is finally to come to an end, then there is only one way – the expulsion of that people whose father is the Devil…”

Streicher’s articles were always filled with Biblical references: “Only the Jews, he shouted, had remained victorious after the dreadful days of World War I. These were the people, he charged, of whom Christ said, ‘Its father is the devil.’”

Both of these quotes of course are in reference to John 8:44, in which Christ said to the mongrel Herodian Jews: “You are of your father the Diabolical One, and the lusts of your father you wish to do. That one was a murderer from the beginning, and he has not stood in the truth because there is no truth in him. When he speaks a lie, he speaks from his own, because he is a liar, and the father of it” (AST).

Streicher also said: “Germans must fight Jews, that organized body of world criminals against whom Christ, the greatest anti-Semite of all time, had fought.”

At Nuremburg, Streicher was convicted of “crimes against humanity,” although his only activity during the war was publishing his newspaper which again served to educate the German people about truths such as Jesus not being a Jew. These were his last words: “Now it goes to God … Purim Fest, 1946.”

Rudolf Hess

“No matter what human beings do I shall someday stand before the judgment seat of the Eternal. I shall answer to Him, and I know He will judge me innocent.” Rudolf Hess (in a statement to the Nuremberg Tribunal)

[Rudolf Heß – Von Nürnberg bis Spandau

„Ich verteidige mich nicht gegen Ankläger, denen ich das Recht abspreche, gegen mich und meine Volksgenossen Anklage zu erheben. Ich setze mich nicht mit Vorwürfen auseinander, die sich mit Dingen befassen, die innerdeutsche Angelegenheiten sind und daher Ausländer nichts angehen. Ich erhebe keinen Einspruch gegen Äußerungen, die darauf abzielen, mich oder das ganze deutsche Volk in der Ehre zu treffen. Ich betrachte solche Anwürfe von Gegnern als Ehrenerweisung. Es war mir vergönnt, viele Jahre meines Lebens unter dem größten Sohne zu wirken, den mein Volk in seiner tausendjährigen Geschichte hervorgebracht hat. Selbst wenn ich es könnte, wollte ich diese Zeit nicht auslöschen aus meinem Dasein. Ich bin glücklich, zu wissen, daß ich meine Pflicht getan habe meinem Volk gegenüber, meine Pflicht als Deutscher, als Nationalsozialist, als treuer Gefolgsmann meines Führers. Ich bereue nichts. Stünde ich wieder am Anfang, würde ich wieder handeln wie ich handelte, auch wenn ich wüßte, daß am Ende ein Scheiterhaufen für meinen Flammentod brennt. Gleichgültig was Menschen tun, dereinst stehe ich vor dem Richterstuhl des Ewigen. Ihm werde ich mich verantworten, und ich weiß, er spricht mich frei.”]

 

Joseph Göbbels

“A Jew is for me an object of disgust. I feel like vomiting when I see one. Christ could not possibly have been a Jew. It is not necessary to prove that scientifically – it is a fact.” Joseph Göbbels (speaking to Hitler)

Joachim Ribbentrop

Joachim Ribbentrop was Hitler’s Minister of Foreign Affairs. While visiting King George VI, he twice saluted him, saying “Heil Hitler.” During the Nuremberg trials, he said, “If in this cell, Adolf Hitler should come to me and say, ‘Do this,’ I would still do it.” He was found guilty of all four major types of crimes and was the first to be hanged. These were his last words: “May God save Germany!”

Hans-Ulrich Rudel

Hans-Ulrich Rudel was Germany’s most decorated soldier, receiving the Knight’s Cross to the Iron Cross with Golden Oak Leaves and Swords and Diamonds, personally designed and presented by Adolf Hitler. He received this for his extraordinary heroism in a career that established him as the greatest aviator of all time. Shot down more than a dozen times, he fought until the last day of the war – even though he had lost a leg and had his other leg in a cast. He was the son of a German preacher and he himself remained an unrepentant Christian and National Socialist his whole life. These words are on a monument dedicated to him and his comrades: “Sacrificial Bravery Overcomes Death.”

Gerhard Kittel

Gerhard Kittel was considered one of the world’s foremost theologians both before and after the war. Even today, his Theological Dictionary of the New Testament is still widely used and respected. He willingly joined the National Socialist Party, feeling it his Christian duty. Even though his activities during the war were limited to teaching and serving on educational committees, he was arrested and imprisoned by the French for seventeen months after the war. He wrote a defence for himself and concluded that race-mixing was wrong, citing the examples of Ezra and Nehemiah.

Alfred Rosenberg

The misuse of the quotes of Alfred Rosenberg stands as the major reason why so many Anglo-Americans have been deceived into thinking that National Socialism represented Nordic pagan beliefs instead of Positive Christianity. Hitler chose Rosenberg for propaganda purposes. However, Adolf Hitler  also established a Reich Christian Church for the future of Germany. Adolf Hitler  did not believe in pagan cults and made his position very clear to Rosenberg. Rosenberg himself wrote that Jesus was Nordic, aggressive, courageous, “a man of true Germanic character,” a revolutionary who opposed the Jewish and Roman systems with sword in hand, bringing not peace but war (see Matthew 10:34-37). Rosenberg later went on to say that he favoured a “positive Christianity.” Any other statements that Rosenberg may have made or may have been reported to have made were not known to Hitler, for Rosenberg was careful to always assure Hitler that he, Rosenberg was a Christian.

Houston Stewart Chamberlain

Houston Stewart Chamberlain, though born British, became a German citizen at an early age and wrote all of his popular books in German, including Foundations of the Nineteenth Century, one of most influential books in Germany prior to Mein Kampf. He was the son-in-law of Richard Wagner and a great ethnologist. A section of his book is devoted to proving that Jesus Christ was not a Jew, and he concluded: “Whoever claimed that Jesus was a Jew was either being stupid or telling a lie … Jesus was not a Jew.” He also stated that, “… no other people was so well equipped as the Teutonic to hear this divine voice.” By 1938, the book had sold more than a million copies. He wrote to Adolf Hitler in 1923, stating, “My faith in Germanism had not wavered an instant … That in the hour of her deepest need Germany gives birth to a Adolf Hitler proves her vitality … May God protect you!”

Party Platform #24

Party Platform #24 of The Program of the National Socialist German Worker’s Party states: “We demand a freedom of religious confessions in this state, as long as they do not endanger the nation’s existence or interfere with the moral sense of the German race. The NSDAP party argues for a positive Christianity, although it is not bound to any single confession. The NSDAP party fights against the Jewish- materialistic spirit in and around us. We are convinced that the healing process of our nation can only be continued on the basis of the principle that public welfare has priority over individual welfare.”

Gottfried Feder

Gottfried Feder was appointed by Adolf Hitler on February 14, 1923, to be the final judge of all questions relating to the Party Platform, including Point 24. He wrote: “The same may be said of all the coarse, stupid attacks on Christianity. Expressions such as ‘Christianity has only done harm’ merely show that the man who utters them has neither human nor political intelligence. One may indeed blame the Churches … but it is wrong to abuse in general terms the greatest phenomenon in human history because of the perversities and erroneous ideas and defaults of individuals. The Christian religion has uplifted and strengthened millions upon millions, and brought them to God by the way of suffering.”

Die Germanische Revolution

Among Adolf Hitler’s private papers was found after the war several handwritten sheets outlining a book he had intended to write which would have been entitled Die Germanische Revolution or The Germanic Revolution. He also conceived a book-cover which he sketched. It is clear from the outline that a great part of this book was to be committed to writing about the Bible, including an accurate account of the history recorded in the Old Testament and the true identity of the Israelites of the Old Testament as Adamic European white people and also a detailed study of the laws in the Bible against race-mixing and the historical consequences of the violation of this law. What follows are excerpts from these outlines which have been reproduced and translated in the book, Hitler’s Letters and Notes by Werner Maser. I.
Introduction
1. The Bible [3 illegible lines (ed.)]
2. The Aryan
3. His Works
4. The Jew
5. His Works
1. The Bible – Monumental History of Mankind … Basic Race Law – 1st consequence. Purification of the Bible – what of its spirit remains? 2nd consequence. … First people’s history (based on) the race law … Racial purity the highest law Miscegenation with inferior types means lowering the level of the whole [last word illegible]…
Bible: Original sin – A terrible fact – Its results. Misery for ever
The Bible teaches 2 Facts
I.) All the nations of the Bible (cultures of Asia Minor, Mesopotamia, Palestine, Egypt) have been destroyed by the Edomite Jews. Why? Reason:
Not wars destroy races only original sin – only blood poisoning
2) Racial purity is a must.

We have demonstrated in a variety of ways that the public record illustrates and proves the Christianity of Adolf Hitler and indeed of the true National Socialist movement. We have further shown that many popular historians are now admitting this fact. Yet, detractors to these facts often point to a number of alleged quotations of Adolf Hitler contained in so-called private records, most of which, after wide circulation and publicity, have been admitted or proven to be forgeries and spurious in nature. These sources are at best hearsay and are of such a dubious nature and have such questionable chains of transmission that none of them could ever be used as evidence in a court of law. On the other hand, in the public record, including Mein Kampf, published during Adolf Hitler’s lifetime, his large number of speeches, preserved on film, audio recordings, and newspaper accounts, the official publications and proclamations of the NSDAP party, and even letters which bear Hitler’s signature, we find nothing to contradict what we have stated so far.

“Adolf Hitler, son of the Catholic Church, died while defending Christianity. It is therefore understandable that words cannot be found to lament over his death, when so many were found to exalt his life. Over his mortal remains stands his victorious moral figure. With the palm of the martyr, God gives Hitler the laurels of Victory.” – General Franco Spanish press on 3rd of May 1945

National Socialist Christians in WW II

National Socialist Christians in WW II

National Socialist Christians in WW II

National Socialist Christians in WW II

National Socialist Christians in WW II

National Socialist Christians in WW II

National Socialist Christians in WW II

National Socialist Christians in WW II

National Socialist Christians in WW II

National Socialist Christians in WW II

National Socialist Christians in WW II

National Socialist Christians in WW II

National Socialist Christians in WW II

National Socialist Christians in WW II

National Socialist Christians in WW II

National Socialist Christians in WW II

National Socialist Christians in WW II

National Socialist Christians in WW II

National Socialist Christians in WW II

National Socialist Christians in WW II

National Socialist Christians in WW II

National Socialist Christians in WW II

National Socialist Christians in WW II

National Socialist Christians in WW II

National Socialist Christians in WW II

National Socialist Christians in WW II

National Socialist Christians in WW II

National Socialist Christians in WW II

National Socialist Christians in WW II

National Socialist Christians in WW II

National Socialist Christians in WW II

National Socialist Christians in WW II

National Socialist Christians in WW II

National Socialist Christians in WW II

National Socialist Christians in WW II

National Socialist Christians in WW II

National Socialist Christians in WW II

National Socialist Christians in WW II

National Socialist Christians in WW II

National Socialist Christians in WW II

National Socialist Christians in WW II

National Socialist Christians in WW II

National Socialist Christians in WW II

National Socialist Christians in WW II

National Socialist Christians in WW II

National Socialist Christians in WW II

National Socialist Christians in WW II

National Socialist Christians in WW II

National Socialist Christians in WW II

National Socialist Christians in WW II

National Socialist Christians in WW II

National Socialist Christians in WW II

National Socialist Christians in WW II

National Socialist Christians in WW II

It is only in these questionable sources, published after the war and after Hitler’s death, that we find the supposed evidence that Hitler was not a Christian.

Thus, it is necessary to deal with these spurious sources and set the record straight. The most popular of these sources is Hitler’s Table Talk (http://truthforgermans.com/?cat=69), with a popular English translation by Cameron and Stevens and with an introduction by H.R. Trevor-Roper. In fact, this is the only complete English translation available.

The following is illustrative of the types of quotations that are popularly cited, all from the Trevor-Roper edition:

If my presence on earth is providential, I owe it to a superior will. But I owe nothing to the Church that traffics in the salvation of souls, and I find it really too cruel. … Our epoch will certainly see the end of the disease of Christianity. It will last another hundred years, two hundred years perhaps. My regret will have been that I couldn’t, like whoever the prophet was, behold the promised land from afar. We are entering into a conception of the world that will be a sunny era, an era of tolerance. … What is important above all is that we should prevent a greater lie from replacing the lie that is disappearing. The world of Judeo-Bolshevism must collapse.

I realize that man, in his imperfection, can commit innumerable errors ­ but to devote myself deliberately to error, that is something I cannot do. I shall never come personally to terms with the Christian lie.

But Christianity is an invention of sick brains: one could imagine nothing more senseless, nor any more indecent way of turning the idea of the Godhead into a mockery.

However, the Table-Talk also is filled with many quotations like the following:

We don’t want to educate anyone in atheism.

An uneducated man, on the other hand, runs the risk of going over to atheism (which is a return to the state of the animal).

It seems to me that nothing would be more foolish than to re-establish the worship of Wotan. Our old mythology had ceased to be viable when Christianity implanted itself.

So we appear to be presented with two different extremes in the same document. It should further be pointed out that nowhere in the Table-Talk does it record Hitler denouncing Jesus Christ, neither the Old or New Testament and very specifically his own Christian faith.

It is very likely that the Table-Talk is indeed based upon actual statements of Hitler, but given the numerous internal inconsistencies and statements that appear to contradict the public and published statements of Hitler, we need to determine if these writings have undergone editing or interpolations. To do this, we must understand how this book came to be.

It first should be stated that not one of the conversations supposedly preserved in the Table-Talk is preserved in any other form such as audio, film, or radio broadcast, and that none of these purported conversations were published during Hitler’s lifetime.

The reported source of the documents is from stenographers chosen by Martin Bormann to record these conversations. This presents the first potential problem with the documents. Bormann was not a Christian (and neither a pagan, but an atheistic opportunist) and maintained his Judakoi pseudo deistic agenda, all the while walking a fine line in his own statements to avoid losing favour with Hitler.

Bormann issued the following directive:

Please keep these notes most carefully, as they will be of very great value in the future. I have now got Heim to make comprehensive notes as a basis for these minutes. Any transcript which is not quite apposite will be re-checked by me.

In other words, Bormann reserved for himself editorial rights over the notes which were taken, and as we will see, he frequently made use of this self-claimed right.

The stenographers used were Heinrich Heim and Henry Picker. The documents were then given to Bormann, and this could have provided an opportunity for Bormann to edit them as he wished or perhaps insert statements that were more to his liking. At some point, Bormann supposedly made two copies of the documents, one of which was kept at Munich, and another sent to Berchtesgaden. The copy at Munich was reportedly burned at the end of the war. The copy at Berchtesgaden is supposedly the source of the published version we have today. It was known as the Bormann Vermerke or Bormann Notes, and this text belonged to François Genoud, who first published the text.

Genoud was a Swiss banker who claimed to be a “Nazi”, but his real motivations are highly questionable. He was known to peddle in many so-called Nazi texts, not a few of which have proven to be complete forgeries. He bought the manuscript from an Italian official in 1948, who reportedly acquired it from Bormann’s wife Gerda, who went to Italy after the war.

There appears also to be a forty-two-page fragment of the manuscript reportedly burned in Munich in the United States Library of Congress, placed there by a Mr. Joseph Schrasberger, who supposedly found the document in Munich after the war.

The stenographer Henry Picker, who replaced Heim, served in that capacity for only a very short time (March 21, 1942 to August 2, 1942). He claimed to have kept a copy of the notes he made during that time and also a copy of the notes Heim had made before him. He had no notes past August 2, 1942, when Heim returned. He claims that Bormann did not edit the notes that he personally made, though the notes given to him from Heim had likely been edited or influenced by Bormann to some degree. Indeed, Picker said that “no confidence can be placed in Bormann’s editing of it,” and also spoke of Bormann’s alterations…” (Trevor-Roper.) Nevertheless, Picker kept the notes he had been given by Heim and his own notes.

Thus, there are three sources in German for the Table-Talk: the Bormann Notes copy of Genoud, which contains the full brunt, of Bormann’s editing’s; the fragment of the Bormann Notes in the Library of Congress; and the limited German text of Picker.

Today, according to Richard Carrier and other sources, there are four main published versions of the Table-Talk.

The first published was the German manuscript of Picker, which contains no entries subsequent to August 1942, and has only five months of entries which Picker attests are free of Bormann alterations. The second to be published was a French translation by Genoud of his copy of the Bormann Notes. The third was the English translation of Stevens and Cameron, edited by Trevor-Roper. This was a translation of the Genoud’s French translation, and was not based upon the German. The fourth and last edition was a printing of Genoud’s German original, prepared by Werner Jochmann.

Before we can begin to sort through whatever alterations Bormann himself may have made to the text, it first should be pointed out how faulty the Trevor-Roper edition is, and the Genoud’s French translation upon which it is based.

Carrier has described the Trevor-Roper edition as “worthless,” and in fact, he has shown that all of the major anti-Christian passages commonly cited by historians, including the three at the beginning of this chapter, are frauds and are not contained in the original German, in his article “Hitler’s Table-Talk: Troubling Finds.”

Let us look at these three popular quotes one by one, in light of Carrier’s article. The first, often quoted passage is,

If my presence on earth is providential, I owe it to a superior will. But I owe nothing to the Church that traffics in the salvation of souls, and I find it really too cruel. I admit that one cannot impose one’s will by force, but I have a horror of people who enjoy inflicting sufferings on others’ bodies and tyranny upon others’ souls.

Our epoch will certainly see the end of the disease of Christianity. It will last another hundred years, two hundred years perhaps. My regret will have been that I couldn’t, like whoever the prophet was, behold the promised land from afar. We are entering into a conception of the world that will be a sunny era, an era of tolerance. Man must be put in a position to develop freely the talents that God has given him.

What is important above all is that we should prevent a greater lie from replacing the lie that is disappearing. The world of Judeo-Bolshevism must collapse.

This quote is supposedly from February 27, 1942, when Heim was stenographer. Carrier provides the German of Jochmann and Picker which agrees, except in a difference of one word, then his own translation of that German:

I am here due to a higher power, if I am necessary for anything. Leave aside that she is too cruel for me, the beatifying Church! I have never found pleasure in maltreating others, even if I know it isn’t possible to stand your ground in the world without force. Life is only given to those who fight for it the hardest. It is the law of life: Defend yourself!

The time in which we live indicates the collapse of this idea. It can still take 100 or 200 years. I am sorry that, like Moses (Old Testament), I can only see the Promised Land from a distance.

We are growing into a sunny, really tolerant worldview: Man shall be able to develop his God-given talents. We must only prevent a new, even greater lie from arising: that of the Jewish-Bolshevist world. That’s what I must destroy.

The difference in these two passages is astounding!

There is no mention of a “disease of Christianity” which will end, but rather Hitler speaks in general of his then present world order. He does not mention that he “owes nothing to the Church.” He boldly states that he is “here due to a higher power,” rather than saying “If I am here…” Rather than speak of Moses condescendingly, he identifies with Moses in his desire to see the Promised Land. He envisions a world free of Jewish-Bolshevism where men will be able to develop fully their God-given talents. So the English edition of Trevor-Roper contains here a complete fabrication, and this fabrication, particularly the line about “the disease of Christianity,” is perhaps the most frequently quoted passage by those who attempt to deny the Christianity of Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist Movement.

Carrier points out that in the same entry in the German, the English and French translations have also omitted an important line. In the same conversation, Hitler said,

Das, was der Mensch vor dem Tier voraus hat, der vielleicht wunderbarste Beweis für die Überlegenheitdes Menschen ist, dass er begriffen hat, das es eine Schöpferkraft geben muss!

Or in Carrier’s translation:

What man has over the animals, possibly the most marvellous proof of his superiority, is that he has understood there must be a Creative Power!

The blatant omission of this passage is proof-positive that the mistranslation of the above passage was a deliberate attempt to take a pro-Christian statement of Hitler and turn it into an anti-Christian statement. This is why it was necessary to entirely omit the above passage, so that the inconsistency of the entry would not be readily apparent.

The second often-quoted passage that Carrier deals with is,

I realize that man, in his imperfection, can commit innumerable errors ­ but to devote myself deliberately to error that is something I cannot do. I shall never come personally to terms with the Christian lie. In acting as I do, I’m very far from the wish to scandalize. But I rebel when I see the very idea of Providence flouted in this fashion. It’s a great satisfaction for me to feel myself totally foreign to that world.

But again, the actual German is quite different.

Carrier’s translation:

I know that humans in their defectiveness will do a thousand things wrong. But to do something wrong against one’s own knowledge, that is out of the question! One should never personally accept such a lie. Not because I want to annoy others, but because I recognize therein a mockery of the Eternal Providence. I am glad if I have no internal connection with them.

Again, the favourite sentence of liars is, “I shall never come personally to terms with the Christian lie.” But this sentence is not in the original German at all! It apparently was inserted into the French by Genoud’s (“Je ne m’accommoderai personnellement jamaisdu mensonge Chrétien“) and then copied into the Trevor-Roper English edition.

Thus, so far, we have an example of the perversion of the text in translation, omission from the original, and addition to the original.

The last example is,

But Christianity is an invention of sick brains: one could imagine nothing more senseless, nor any more indecent way of turning the idea of the Godhead into a mockery

But Picker’s German contains four important words that have been omitted by Genoud and Trevor-Roper. The English should be,

The Christianity that teaches Transubstantiation is the maddest thing ever concocted by a human brain in its delusion, a mockery of all that is godly.

So Hitler did not say that Christianity was an invention of sick brains, but that the doctrine of Transubstantiation was the invention of sick brains. However, even this point is controversial as Adolf Hitler remained a devout Catholic, was never ex-communicated (http://truthforgermans.com/?cat=60) and the “statement” is rather the view of a bigoted “Protestant”.

So Hitler did not have a problem with Christianity, but with perversions of Christianity.

In nearly every other supposedly negative statement about Christianity contained in the Table-Talk, the statements are not about Christianity but about Churchian perversions of Christianity.

In fact, the Table Talk makes it clear that Hitler, as time went on, was becoming decreasingly optimistic about the chances of a successful reformation of the Catholic Church. Nevertheless, not once is Hitler’s belief in the Old Testament, the New Testament, Jesus Christ or his own Christianity a question. But he did come to more and more question the Churches (both Catholic and Protestant).

Thus, in dealing with the Table-Talk, we have many problems. First, the only English translation available, the Trevor-Roper edition, is hopelessly corrupt; it is a translation of Genoud’s translation, and Genoud’s translation has been purposefully altered. What did this Swiss banker who claimed to be a “Nazi” really have planned? At best, he was a confused atheist who sought to de-Christianize National Socialism, á la Bormann; but at worst, and probably more realistic, he was an agent of the Jew propagandists who spent much of his personal fortune buying up Nazi relics and distributing supposedly authentic texts like the Table-Talk.

The historian David Irving has stated that Genoud admitted that he personally forged a document called Hitler’s Last Testament. Genoud also spent years in court trying to sew-up copyrights to the Table-Talk to ensure that his perversion of the document would be the only one available. Indeed Picker’s German text was not complete, so that left Genoud plenty of room to falsify the text all he wanted. It was not until 1980 that Jochmann’s complete German text was published, but even this is merely a printing of a text that the forger Genoud had in his possession for nearly thirty years, plenty of time to corrupt the post 1942 entries all he wanted, since he knew that his manuscript was the sole source for these entries.

Then there is the issue of Bormann. To what extent did he pervert the Table-Talk and the notes of Heim? Again, there exists only five months’ worth of entries in Picker’s text which have not in some way been influenced by Bormann; and of course we are assuming that Picker, who was selected by Bormann for the position as stenographer, was not his willing accomplice, who only later sought to distance himself and his text from Bormann and therefore Genoud’s text, since the two were involved in a potentially lucrative copyright dispute. Many scholars and historians have elucidated places in the text where Bormann has clearly edited it or added his own comments. Carrier comments on an alteration by Bormann that tried to make Hitler’s mention of God appear deistic and not theistic. How far did Bormann take this perversion? It is clear that Bormann is responsible for two statements in the Table-Talk that are anti-Paul. But how much and how often Bormann has perverted the text will forever remain unclear.

Finally, we must also wonder how complete and accurate the notes of Heim and Picker are. These documents were written in shorthand, often in very abbreviated format, only later to be fleshed out by Bormann. How much did they miss while trying to take down the dictation of the fast-speaking Hitler? And how did these missing parts affect the context of what was being said? Also, the Table-Talk does not record when the conversation was meant to be sarcastic or joking. Are we to believe that Hitler never spoke in jest or sarcasm?

The answer to these many questions will never be known. Thus, what importance can the Table-Talk be? It is of importance only when it agrees with the public record. If in any point it provides new information that does not correspond with the public record of Hitler and National Socialism, it cannot be trusted, particularly when we can identify a cause for such a perversion, such as Bormann’s “deism” to the conclusion atheism.

So, for example, let’s take the following quote from the Table-Talk,

Luther had the merit of rising against the Pope and the organisation of the Church. It was the first of the great revolutions. And thanks to his translation of the Bible, Luther replaced our dialects by the great German language (which is also inaccurate as the Holy Scriptures (Greek Septuagint was already translated and available)!

These are all sentiments that Adolf Hitler is recorded expressing elsewhere, in Mein Kampf and in his public speeches; so, in this case this can likely be judged an authentic quote.

There are many other sources of quotations and statements from Hitler. After the war, literally dozens of people who purportedly met Hitler wasted no time in writing their accounts of Hitler. Most of these were written without the benefit of any notes and were supposed to contain accurate remembrances of what someone may have heard Adolf Hitler  say 10, 20, or even 30 years earlier. Needless to say, this is an almost impossible task. Psychologists have studied people’s memories and found that people are more likely to invent than to recreate. So, even if someone were trying to be honest and accurately record what they thought Adolf Hitler  might have said 20 years earlier, it is more likely that they will create what they thought Adolf Hitler might have said, based upon their own prejudices and certainly affected by how the Jewish media had painted Adolf Hitler over the years.

More than this, however, it must be understood that all of these books and articles that were reported to contain the intimations of Adolf Hitler were being financed and published by Jewish-controlled publishing companies. So only those books that contained something of value to the Jews were likely to find a publisher.

Nevertheless, there are some sources of private conversations of Adolf Hitler that can be given more credence than others. In order for a source to be even halfway reliable, it must be based upon notes or diaries made at the time of the conversation. Even then, those notes run the risk of incorporating the author’s personal biases. Still, these types of sources have proven to be much more reliable; though another caveat is that the original author of those notes or authors should be the one, while still living, to publish them. This is because there have been a whole line of forgeries that have made it to print. So it is necessary for a verifiable chain of custody to exist.

Thus, in general, all sources of sayings, quotations, or conversations of Adolf Hitler  that did not come Adolf Hitler himself should be held in question. In Mein Kampf and the thousands of speeches of Adolf Hitler, as well as various hundreds of other notes, speeches and documents in his hand or bearing his signature, there is more than enough information to know what Adolf Hitler  thought, and anything contradictory to that public body of information should be discarded.

An example of just how daring forgers will go is The Hitler Diaries. In 1981, the editor of the German magazine Stern paid $2,000,000 to buy a 62 volume set of diaries that were reported to be Hitler’s personal diaries. Two independent handwriting experts confirmed that they were authentic based upon a sample of Hitler’s handwriting they were given. Rupert Murdoch, the Zionist Jewish owner of Fox television and dozens of other media outlets, bought the translation rights to the diaries, and after authentication by his own expert, began publishing them in his British Sunday Times in 1983. Later that year, the West German police examined the paper and inks and bindings of the diaries. They found that the paper contained a chemical invented in 1954. The bindings contained polymers that did not exist during Hitler’s life. And all four of the inks used throughout the diaries did not exist during Hitler’s lifetime. As it turned out, handwriting experts had been fooled because the handwriting sample they were provided that was supposed to contain authentic handwriting of Hitler was actually made by the forger, and provided to them by Stern staff journalist Gerd Heidemann, who was an accomplice of the forger, Konrad Kujau. Both were sentenced to prison. It should be noted that Hugh Trevor-Roper, the editor of the previously discussed English edition of the Table-Talk, was one of the original “experts” who said that the diaries were authentic. He had published an article in The Sunday Times testifying to their authenticity.

Was this elaborate forgery just an attempt to make some money, as it was initially claimed? Apparently not. In 2002, Der Spiegel published evidence that showed that Gerd Heidemann had been a member of the Stasi, which was the East German equivalent of the CIA. Heidemann was in fact a Communist agent, positioned in the West German media. He had been working for them for 30 years when the forgeries were published. Heidemann had been a deeply planted agent, who gained many inroads into the circles of former National Socialists, befriending men such as former SS official Klaus Barbie, Wolf Hess, the son of Rudolph Hess, and even dating Edda Göring, the daughter of Hermann Göring. Starting in 1978, his file indicates that he began working for the Stasi’s foreign espionage department. Apparently, his first assignment was this failed coup by the Communist Jews to forever claim for themselves the right to tell people what Hitler really thought, as revealed in his own personal diaries.

The Hitler Diaries is but the most famous example of such forgeries, but by no means the only example. The fraud failed because the Jews were too brazen. They have learned that it is much easier to corrupt existing documents or forge writings by lesser-known figures than Hitler. But these and other attempts, some exposed, some not, all serve to muddy the water and serve as source material for Jewish historians.

Albert Speer is another unfortunate example. His memoir, Inside the Third Reich, is a favourite of the Jewish propagandists. Yet, the diaries appear to have been corrupted. David Irving first inquired of Speer in 1966 why the English edition of the book differs so greatly from the German edition. Speer confided that the book had been thoroughly re-written by staff-members of the publishing company, a fact that Irving later confirmed from the publishers. Speer told Irving in 1979, when Irving asked him why he did not publish the original book, “That would be impossible. That manuscript was quite out of keeping with the modern nuances. Even the captions to the chapters would have caused difficulties.”

Irving has also documented in his introduction to Hitler’s War a number of other forged or heavily tampered-with documents. Here, we will provide just a brief list.

– Works by Konrad Heiden, Hans Bernard Gisevius, Erich Kordt, and Fritz Wiedemann have also proven to be concoctions.

– Carl Jakob Burckhardt’s diary.

– Hermann Rauschning’s Conversations with Hitler is largely embellished and fictional.

– Fritz Thyssen’s I Paid Hitler.

– The forged Christa Schroeder diary, actually written by Albert Zoller.

– Large sections of The Testament of Adolf Hitler are probably fictitious.

– The diaries of Vice Admiral Wilhelm Canaris.

– Eva Braun’s diaries (forged from the diary of Countess Irma Larisch-Wallersee). There did exist an authentic diary of Braun, which was recovered after the war, but this diary disappeared shortly thereafter and has never been seen again.

– The diary of Feliz Kersten, the reported masseuse of Himmler and Ribbentrop, is also a complete fraud.

– There are obvious corruptions and frauds in Count Galeazzo Ciano’s famous diaries.

– Luftwaffe Chief of Staff Karl Koller’s published diary is a forgery.

And the list goes on. Even authentic diaries, memoirs, or accounts are likely to contain corruptions or interpolations from the publishers, even if the author is alive, such as Speer’s Inside the Third Reich, or even David Irving’s Hitler’s War, which, when translated to German, was altered significantly by the German publisher.

The number of corruptions and forgeries seems almost endless. Even authentic documents, accurately published, often times contain old lies and fraudulent claims that have been put forth by the Jewish propaganda machine since the 1920’s. Thus, the reliable sources are few, but they are sufficient to accurately piece together an authentic account of Hitler and the Third Reich.